![]() ![]() With continuous autofocus, the EOS R manages to eke out one more frame per second compared to the RP, but the burst rates of 5 and 4 fps, respectively, are far from class-leading. This is where both cameras actually suffer from the same limitation, brought on by the complexities of Canon’s excellent but processor-intensive Dual Pixel Autofocus (more on that below). But if you prefer to put as much work into retouching your photos as you do in taking them, the R will give you more room to play around. If you’re a casual photographer who wants a usable JPEG right form the camera and doesn’t care as much as editing flexibility, the RP won’t let you down. We’ve found its sensor to produce cleaner images at high ISOs with noticeably more dynamic range at low ISOs, which lets you adjust exposure and lighten shadows more in post processing. JPEGs straight out of the camera are very strong from both models, but if you want to get the most out out every pixel, you’ll need to shoot in RAW - and this is where the EOS R has the edge. And in truth, the differences between the two may not matter to many people. ![]() With the same ISO range and resolutions just a few megapixels apart, you’d be forgiven for not thinking the EOS R’s sensor was really any better than the RP’s. 30.3 megapixel full-frame CMOS with optical low pass filterĢ6.2 megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor with optical low pass filterĥ fps, or 4 fps with continuous autofocusĥ,655-point Dual Pixel autofocus, eye-detection AFĤ,779-point Dual Pixel autofocus down to -5 EVĤK at 24 fps with a 1.7x crop, 1080p at 60 fpsĠ.5 inch 3.69 million dot EVF with 23mm eye pointĠ.39 inch 2.36 million dot EVF with 22mm eyepointģ.15 inch, 2.10 million dots tilting touchscreenģ.0-inch, 1.04 million dot tilting touchscreen ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |